Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (244774)	8/4/2005 3:09:08 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) of 1576163

If the parents aren't willing to raise the child, they shouldn't be having (unprotected) sex. Well that may be feasible under the Taliban, but it doesn't work that way in most of the world. And if society forbids a woman from aborting an unwanted unborn child, I think some of the responsibility for that child should be society's - society wants it, the mother doesn't. Like I said before, you want society to pay the costs of supporting your dream of a Brave New World where "free sex" is encouraged. No, I want states which ban abortion to pay the cost of the ban - which is the cost or raising unwanted children. Anyway, its interesting to me that the anti-abortion crowd is concerned with that much more than just the life of the child. No need to bring up adoption, because that's an institution of mercy and charity, not a license to have sex without consequences. Well its hard to have the discussion without bringing up adoption. Don't most pro-choice people think that a woman who doesn't want a child should deliver the child and give it up for adoption? The Fetus Preservation Machine is the same idea except it includes the ~6 month inside the machine.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next