International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tim Hall who wrote (24792)	11/7/1997 1:00:00 PM
From: mark silvers	of 35569

Thall <<NO>> Good, now that you are on record as ssaying that you don't believe that Ledoux would lie about CERTIFYING THE PRESENCE OF GOLD AND PLATINUM AT FRANKLIN LAKE, why can't IPM also have both metals on their property? The desert dirt saga is one where the final chapter has yet to be written. Over the past year I have read on this thread various experts say that it is impossible to have the presence of both metals in the same ore body. That is obviously no longer true. Many other preconcieved "truths", or "known facts" are going to fall by the wayside as the this little story unfolds. It is going to change the way people think, and for some that change will come only begrudgingly, as some of the underpinnings of a long held belief system slowly erode away. Mark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next