Fearless he seems to be, but I have no leader, Gerald, I think you know that. And I'm not up to date on this thread, I was just scanning the post titles and the "pendejo" bit jumped out, now that's ad hominem, and a sign of a limited vocabulary to boot.
"If Naxos is a scam does that make IPM a scam? Does Bre-X (with its supposed "normal" deposit) being a scam make Northern Crown a scam? Or Manhattan Minerals? Or Echo Bay? Or American Berrick? Or Pegasus? Or Battle Mountain? Or Placer Dome? After all, these all have "normal" deposits too."
All those "normal" deposits actually vary widely in composition, "no two alike" I've heard, at least not exactly alike, the variety far exceeds that of the styles of stock promoters.
"Economical" might be a more useful word than "normal".
Gerald, I do see a relationship between the various Desert Dirts and their histories, which go back over a hundred years, right? There are those who believe that the phenomenom has something to do with Arizona mining law, or the lack of it. So I do think there's a connection when discussing basic credibility, and it's on-topic. But then I haven't read all the posts, either. I expect you feel differently, so we could maybe agree to disagree on that one.
Pretty hard to see how anyone looking at IPM closely enough to consider buying shares could be confused by the comparison with details of Naxos. And to directly answer your question, no, if Naxos is a scam, that does not necessarily make IPM a scam. But I would not close my mind to the possibility if I was holding paper, either.
Several responsible longs here have encouraged people to go out and do their own DD. I humble submit that this should mean a lot more than just talking to the company, but for those who choose to do only that, it's a free country.
......... cheers .............. marcos |
