SI Grammar and Spelling Lab Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (2508)	5/21/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Anaxagoras	Read Replies (1) of 4711

BTW, I have a different take on the disagreement that started this whole interesting excursion. <<I sentence you both to 20 lashes.>> It is common for sentences to be elliptical, i.e. to have certain expressions left out. The advantage of ellipsis lies in brevity, but it can also lead to ambiguity. The expression above can be used elliptically for the following: <<I sentence you both to 20 lashes [each].>> Now, I'm not claiming that this is what the first person who used the sentence had in mind when he posted it. What I am claiming is that it would be perfectly acceptable to use the sentence elliptically for the sentence I fleshed out above. Now consider the meaning of the expanded version. Although it involves a legal fiction, the metaphor is one of the courts. Both stand before the judge, both are sentenced together (fiction), but each is to receive his own respective 20 lashes. :-) Fun, fun, fun.... BTW, nice school, my fellow alum. Anaxagoras

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next