Hello Burt - the first letter to Lucent was polite and refined; second time - well it was direct and blunt NOT rude and obnoxious.
FURTHERMORE, the reaction by Lucent was NOT due to any language in an email - it had to do with the content of the inquiry to verify that the public document Lucent has in their pdf file on their public web site pertaining to the contract with Xstream UK company parental had ANYTHING to do with XSNI ; if you are going to do DD, and the company is evasive, get direct and to the point so there are NO misunderstandings. That way you are NOT wasting your time nor the company time :)
Oh, and I didn't get Lucent mad - I alerted them to a potential problem and they had their attorneys contact Xstream, just by asking a simple question. And you know the rest of the story, at least I think you can read and comprehend.
None of that cloak and dagger crap from me, Burt. Next time you need to see what is going on and get some tips, I shall whistle, and say the words, "come here boy", just like my parrot Charlie calls for Bart.
As for stalking, you don't have any idea of what it is liked to be stalked. I have no cares for your drives down Central or any other aspects of your life. You started calling me names here immediately after I called Lehmans in May, and that was NOT justified, and you are either going to give me an apology in the same forum you bashed me or you can expect me to pop up when you least expect it. Now go think on that.
Good bye, and have a nice day Burt :) Demi |
