Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Geoff Altman who wrote (251501)	5/23/2008 11:36:20 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	of 793882

There's truth in both sides of the argument. In order for Mull to be right he'd have to prove intent, that's where the conjecture starts... It's possible, I suppose. I still don't see why it should be verboten to mention RFK, even if it does remind people that untoward events can happen in a campaign. It's a plain historical fact. If Obama is so far gone in the racial-grievance-mongering mode that his only possible reaction is to get hysterical over it, well that says something about him. Suppose he had remained cool and didn't mention it, and only in response to a reporter's question had said, "well it was an unfortunate reference and I for one do not think she was trying to suggest anything," which would rather imply the opposite. Wouldn't that look cool and in control? How does he look now? Obama is a talented minor-leaguer who was rushed to the majors too soon. He is losing his cool under pressure. And without cool, he ain't got nothin.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next