Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (2511)	10/14/2000 9:14:46 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 10042

Tim, assuming that your position is logical, and indeed a fetus is "alive", you must have a concept as to when that life started, A fetus is alive for its entire existance as a fetus. A zygote is alive and when it become a fetus it reamins alive. Sperm and unfertilized egg cells are alive, but they are not a seperate human life. The next question would be can other rational being chose differently than you have? Rational people can have different opinions but if I see their opinions as leading them to kill innocent unborn children then I must oppose them. Last, I do not appreciate you terming my holy bible teachings "ridiculous", these teaching have served many for thousands of years. I promise not to term your "opinion" on when life start ridiculous either. I rarely call other people's opinions ridculous. But 1 - You stated - "but calling it "killing" is nothing short of ridiculous, since you cannot kill something which is not alive." and 2 - I truely do believe the position that the fetus is not alive to be ridiculous. It is alive. It can be killed. The position that it does not qualify for human rights I would call wrong but I would not call ridiculous. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next