Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E who wrote (25283)	10/6/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: Rick Julian	Read Replies (1) of 108807

"Even if you happened to think adultery was fine for you and your wife, you could presumably understand that if you didn't feel that way, you wouldn't want an outsider doing things that outraged you unto your wife." In my example a single male committed adultery with a married woman. Any presumption that adultery is an outrage for others would be founded on my awareness of a moral precept. If morality were defined by what I alone deem moral (ie, existentialism), I would be acting in harmony with my belief system. That is why I'm seeking a definition of the atheist moral code. What is it based on? Again, the Golden rule seems too general and presupposes a shared sense and awareness of morality.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next