Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jpthoma1 who wrote (250)	2/7/2002 8:36:47 PM
From: WillP	Read Replies (1) of 613

Will, you should be proud of your quotation. The only one I used was :Let's wait for the sample results Not to worry. I'm content with all of my quotations. Some of these results came out today (hole 4). Yes, they sure did. As soon as other holes will be available, we will be nearer than ever from a more precise grade determination. Uhh, why do you say that? I'll put more faith in 250 tonnes than 250 kilograms. How about you guys? And, I think that you will agree with me that precise grade is an important data in determining profitability of an operation. I certainly agree, in theory. Determining a precise grade is a tough project, however. Question: Where are results from holes 1 to 3? Well, there were about three tonnes of samples at Lakefield. No clear guarantee that any of them were from holes 1 to 3 however.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next