Evolution Message Board - Msg: 25585754

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (2532)	4/21/2009 11:54:44 AM
From: LLCF	of 69300

<Yet they are still presented uncritically in numerous text books AS THE TRUTH, as are peppered moths and finch beaks.> Then why don't you work to get that changed? Hello? <"Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" is one of the main pillars that the leaning tower of the evolutionary theory of everything is based on.> No, not Haekel's "version". Which is exactly WHY you don't throw all of EVO DEVO (or acknolege Haekel's roll in it) out with his crappy science. The parallels between evolution and development ARE very interesting AND REAL... despite the way creationists luv to want to throw the whole thing out: 8e.devbio.com Why don't you read a bit so you can discuss it. <What does that have to do with the price of eggs?> Exactly... what were you talking about. <WOW! Where to begin....> Ummm, exactly.... guy, you miss the point... I think you came in blustering in the middle or something... The (fits year logic) point is you can throw out (Heakel's drawings) but not Evo-Devo... you seem to be of the mistaken belief that evo-devo hangs on Heakel??? Further that all of evolution hangs on evo-devo? <Further; Haekel's fraud is still being perpetuated and endorsed by current text books that are being used to lie to young impressionable minds in a purposeful attempt to bolster an otherwise unsustainable theory.> IF those textbooks use Haekels drawings to "support" evolution, of course they be changed out (likely they're decades old, whhich we discussed before you came in blubbering), more likely they use the drawings just like they use the drawings of LaMarcks girraffe. IN NO WAY does "evolution" hang on Haekel's drawings.... Jeeeeez WAKE UP! And to assert so, "sir"..... is actually among THE WORST intellectual dishonesty (or just outright ignorance). DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next