SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LLCF who wrote (25337)10/6/2000 2:14:15 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
another $2 billion down the drain....Al, yer gotta print us up some mo'...

By: Cecily Barnes, CNET News.com
10/6/00 9:50:00 AM
Source: News.com

In a strongly worded research note, Salomon Smith Barney analyst Jack B. Grubman cut his ratings on AT&T on Friday, saying investors have not taken into account the charge AT&T could face in the near future related to a potential increase in its holdings of Excite@Home>Excite@Home>Excite@HomeIn>Excite@HomeIn March, AT&T, which owns a majority stake in Excite@Home, gave cable companies Cox Communications and Comcast the option to sell holdings of 30 million shares each of Excite@Home at $48 per share, in exchange for their board seats.

AT&T agreed to make up the difference between the $48 price and Excite@Home's actual stock price, trading today at $10.44. If Cox and Comcast exercise this option, AT&T could take a hit of up to $2 billion.

"We believe this is not yet factored into 'Street' consensus estimates for 2001," Grubman wrote. "With Excite@Home trading at $12 per share, there would be a $2 billion liability on AT&T's balance sheet if AT&T had to file a 10Q today," he wrote, referring to a quarterly earnings statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Grubman cut AT&T's rating to "outperform" from "buy" and lowered his earnings projections for 2000 to $1.65 from $1.73, and for 2001 to $1.55 from $1.97. He further justified his downgrade by saying the company has "sluggish fundamentals" and lacks the positioning of other telephone carriers.

"We believe AT&T is in a strategic bind," Grubman wrote. "It does not have the pervasive connectivity to end users like a Bell company, and also lacks the global data/IP network that WorldCom has."

Shares of AT&T fell $1.13, or 3.9 percent, to $27.75 at midmorning Friday. The stock has fallen more than 50 percent from its 52-week high of $61.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext