Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jackjc who wrote (25383)	11/14/2006 2:36:46 PM
From: E. Charters	of 78409

Montana may work in some way. The potential is much more than they are advertising. It is an easy to grind, 70% gravity recovery, limestone, Carlin type ore, with occasional near surface very wide widths. Good grades too. Nobody knows how much is there. Granted there is a ban on surface heap leach operations but Tamarack is underground and they can use cyanide in their admittedly small plant. Potter may be a sleeper. Good grades and widths. Underground at depth, but Kidd, in Timmins nearby is far deeper. They need a mill, and they need to rebuild that headframe. At least they know how to do all that stuff. Gamble thinks the hyaloclastite may hide horizons that extend quite a ways past the mine proper, so there is a finite chance the ore picture nearer surface may improve. Most of that stuff that they may find would need ramps to get to. Chances? Hard to say. I saw sulfides 1000 feet from the mine with no drilling as strange as it may seem. Economics? Awaits exploration. EC<:-}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next