Strictly: Drilling II Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: energyplay who wrote (25351)	1/11/2003 8:53:08 PM
From: t4texas	of 36161

fnm can avoid the pro forma problem altogether by just reporting gaap compliant earnings and dropping the pro forma stuff. however i think it would be easy for fnm to wordsmith (weaselword, etc.) any differences between ITS version of Pro Forma versus gaap. some companies have already started doing this. i don't remember exactly which one, but i recall either txn or csco (maybe it was both of them) doing this with its last quarter's earnings. i am just amazed that fnm would have the balls to protest something so simple as telling the public investors what its version of pro forma means versus gaap. i just consider it dissembling when such protests come out of such a leveraged outfit.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next