Value Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Senior who wrote (25557)	12/17/2006 8:11:34 PM
From: pcyhuang	Read Replies (2) of 78728

Paul & Carl: You are quite right in saying that MF is not recommending CWTR, but simply points out that CWTR has had the qualities of a potential 20 beggars. Please note that's the reason my selected topic for discussion ends with a question mark (?). Yes, I have recommended CWTR as a contrarian investment when the stock came down from 30's with huge volume and broke the uptrend line. I have CWTR in one of our contrarian portfolios. When I read the MF's article, my enthusiasm about CWTR being mentioned has caused by brain not seeing the three words in the article, "in the past". Nonetheless, I think CWTR can be qualified as a value investment since its PEG (5 yrs. expected) ratio is >1, and is definitely worth following. pcyhuang

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next