Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (2550)	6/25/1999 2:11:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	of 4504

<<As a matter of fact they don't if they aren't economic. >> Exactly what I said ELizabeth... you see.. we can agree on something. <<Why don't you address some of the real issues I've raised rather than ferreting off into some vague valuation theory? >> First it is not a vague evaluation theory and is useful in establishing a potential value on a deposit that will be economic at some specific base metal prices to be established later in a feasibility study. Exactly in the same way you will see gold analysts using numbers like US$25 (now) or $US100 (in 1996) per ounce of gold in the ground. << seeing as you have set yourself up as an expert? >> Never said I was an expert in metallurgy ? But as I said, I will try to come back to you on your metallurgical comments.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next