SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sea Otter who wrote (255955)6/27/2008 10:49:06 PM
From: Nadine Carroll   of 793888
 
Steve, just so I understand you: are you saying the USGS, the US Academy of Sciences, NASA, the IPCC etc are liars? Snake-oil salesmen? That's a pretty sweeping charge. Correct me if I didn't hear this correctly.



Sure they are. You can find the evidence in their own publications. Compare the scary stuff in summaries (written by politicians) with the scientific conclusions in the scientific papers. Much, much weaker, with scientists now changing their minds as evidence for the models fails to show up. We haven't warmed in 10 years; the models all said we would. But no journalist looks at the science. Heck, just compare the stuff in each summary with the stuff that's been quietly retired from previous summaries, like Mann's infamous hockey stick chart. Meanwhile the IPCC claims any scientist who ever reviewed any part of any study as a supporter. Journalists lap it up.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News