SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Les H who wrote (25868)1/4/1999 5:21:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) of 67261
 
My understanding is that the wealthy SS recipients are yelling the loudest with regards to the "its not a tax" theme. They see the possibility of their windfall recinded if SS is redefined to only serve those that need it. So I wouldnt really call it a "squeaky wheel" phenomenon.

BTW I disagree with you in that I think you could fund all kinds of needy people with SS, extended care, those on disabilities etc and everything would be just fine if you took the 'well to do' off the SS roster. I say, those that need SS and Medicare should get full benefits. Those that don't, get their money back with some nominal interest payments. That way, they cant say they were cheated. BTW this would mean most homeowners in California would not be eligible for full benefits since the average house is 500K+.

Michelle
PS Imo Kerry who is a democrat has done the most to educate and champion true reform of Social Security.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News