Iomega Thread without Iomega Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: craigl who wrote (2588)	10/23/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Philip J. Davis	of 10072

craigl, Rocky is not responsible for IOM dropping from 27 to where it is now, though that is clearly part of his intent. No one deserves what he dishes out. His intent is malicious. He wants to hurt, malign and impugn without regard to logic, reason or fairness. For this, he deserves the criticism he gets. There are those on this thread, however, who take the opposite side of the coin. They play up Iomega's prospects, irrespective of the risks and probability that Iomega can and has failed - the intent of which is to try and increase Iomega's share price. They deserve criticism as well. Shorting IOM is no more immoral than is playing the long side - as long as you follow the rules of common decency. Ken Pomaranski is a good example of a bull/bear that is fair, reasoned and skeptical - as well as optimistic when fundamentals allow. sincerely, Philip

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next