SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill8/11/2008 1:14:36 PM
   of 793926
 
One thing that could work is to put a squadron of our new F-22's over at the Makhachala airbase with a Airborne command plane to direct them. If they are as good as the AF says they are, they could wipe out the Russian attack. In any case, that scenario would make a great Clancy novel.

Russia Broadens Attack on Georgia
POWERLINE
Russian troops have attacked and occupied a Georgian military base near the town of Senaki, which is in western Georgia, nowhere near South Ossetia. This map, courtesy of Stratfor, shows the position clearly:


Russia's attack on the Senaki base contradicts its prior assurances that "We are not moving beyond the boundaries [of South Ossetia] on principle.... Russian peacekeeping forces do not have the task of invading Georgian territory."

Which raises the question: what are we going to do about it? Responses by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice are detailed here. Bush says he was "very firm" when he spoke with Vladimir Putin. Cheney told Georgia's President that "Russian aggression must not go unanswered, and that its continuation would have serious consequences for its relations with the United States." However, "White House officials refused to indicate what recourse the United States might have if the attacks continue."

In this crisis, the strongest voice has been John McCain's. He gave a statement on the situation today in Pennsylvania in which he emphasized both Georgia's friendship with the United States and its strategic importance:

...............What the people of Georgia have accomplished in terms of democratic governance, a Western orientation, and domestic reform is nothing short of remarkable. That makes Russia's recent actions against the Georgians all the more alarming. In the face of Russian aggression, the very existence of independent Georgia and the survival of its democratically-elected government are at stake.

In recent days Moscow has sent its tanks and troops across the internationally recognized border into the Georgian region of South Ossetia. Statements by Moscow that it was merely aiding the Ossetians are belied by reports of Russian troops in the region of Abkhazia, repeated Russian bombing raids across Georgia, and reports of a de facto Russian naval blockade of the Georgian coast. ...

The implications of Russian actions go beyond their threat to the territorial integrity and independence of a democratic Georgia. Russia is using violence against Georgia, in part, to intimidate other neighbors such as Ukraine for choosing to associate with the West and adhering to Western political and economic values. As such, the fate of Georgia should be of grave concern to Americans and all people who welcomed the end of a divided of Europe, and the independence of former Soviet republics. The international response to this crisis will determine how Russia manages its relationships with other neighbors.

We have other important strategic interests at stake in Georgia, especially the continued flow of oil through the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which Russia attempted to bomb in recent days; the operation of a critical communication and trade route from Georgia through Azerbaijan and Central Asia; and the integrity and influence of NATO, whose members reaffirmed last April the territorial integrity, independence, and sovereignty of Georgia.........................

The question, of course, is what the West--which mostly means us--should do. McCain offers a laundry list of measures, some of which are standard diplomatic fare. These could amount to more:

.............NATO's North Atlantic Council should convene in emergency session to demand a ceasefire and begin discussions on both the deployment of an international peacekeeping force to South Ossetia and the implications for NATO's future relationship with Russia, a Partnership for Peace nation. NATO's decision to withhold a Membership Action Plan for Georgia might have been viewed as a green light by Russia for its attacks on Georgia, and I urge the NATO allies to revisit the decision. ...

Working with allied partners, the U.S. should immediately consult with the Ukrainian government and other concerned countries on steps to secure their continued independence. This is particularly important as a number of Russian Black Sea fleet vessels currently in Georgian territorial waters are stationed at Russia's base in the Ukrainian Crimea.

The U.S. should work with Azerbaijan and Turkey, and other interested friends, to develop plans to strengthen the security of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline............

All such measures--not to mention the usual diplomatic steps--are useful only to the extent that they involve the actual or potential use of force or meaningful economic sanction. Russia will not be deterred from trying to reassert control over the lost provinces of its empire by condemnations and resolutions. Frankly, I'd feel more confident that such measures would be undertaken or credibly threatened if McCain were President. President Bush once had the fortitude to deal with this sort of crisis, but seems to have lost it. As for Barack Obama, the less said the better.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext