SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera!
NAMX 0.00010000.0%Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Terry Lyon who wrote (2622)2/11/1998 6:34:00 PM
From: M. M. Jones   of 4736
 
Let me for the second time try to make myself clear. Marty seriously misquoted me, and I tried to correct that misrepresentation in the post you are responding to and questioning. Yes, there seems to be gas in Nebraska. (I'll remove my qualification after I've had a chance to speak with KNE.) I have never in any way said or implied otherwise, on SI or privately. But there is no independent confirmation of how much gas there is in Nebraska or the quality of that gas. NAMX has implied that H.J. Gruy has done tests and these tests show a large field there. Yesterday an H. J. Gruy spokesman said this is not true. He said H.J. Gruy does not have sufficient material to issue a report of any kind on the Nebraska field. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that we have never seen an independent report on the wells drilled in Colorado (UPR). They have been promised repeatedly, but no one has ever seen a report. We have never seen a report on ANY of NAMX's claims. That's why it was rather shocking yesterday to hear that Gruy did not have enough samples to make a report of any kind.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext