SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : METRICOM - Wireless Data Communications
MCOM 0.00610-12.9%3:44 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Caxton Rhodes who wrote (2665)11/21/2000 4:10:00 PM
From: Rich Wolf   of 3376
 
Caxton, I'll repeat: none of the 3G systems, QCOM included, can provided the throughput that MCOM currently does. Further, do you suppose cellular carriers who rollout HDR for the WAP phone users (in 2004 or whenever) won't bill per minute? That is, if one dared to really download a significant amount of data, would they provide it for a flat fee? I'll tell you the answer now: no.

Just remember: spatial reuse of spectrum. Metricom's microcell architecture provides it, the QCOM system does not. Further, the QCOM rep you quoted earlier attempted to imply that the MCOM system was more expensive to deploy, since it used 50 microcellular radios within a 12 sq. mile area (coverage area of one cell site). What she didn't tell you was that the microcell radios only cost $1500 each, have minimal setup time, and minimal effective lease cost per site (just the small ROW fees to the local utility, together with a few free R2 accounts).

I've done my DD. That's why I invested in MCOM for broadband wireless. They will be the only gorilla in this game.

The 3G systems serve a completely different niche. They do NOT provide true 'broadband' wireless, just snippets of data. For a fee each time.

Enjoy!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext