SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : QDRX
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Casey who wrote (2682)9/15/1997 3:12:00 PM
From: Daniel E. Urroz   of 3977
 
I agree, my point was they should have had a bigger contract in place 1 1/2 years ago with bike. They had to give us some sort of goods news because of the extra reg-s. Your right the $2,000,000 isn't squat compared to the number of shares. I'm sure some would say that it's a start, give them a chance ect. I wonder if Jimbo lowered the profit margin to ink the deal. If the margins were lowered and you take out operating expenses and material what is the bottom line?

Not to sound negative but if you look back at the times they done the reg-s, they seem to manage a press release or two to give us the impression alls well. The only time they didn't follow this pattern IMO is the time Palermo gave a release saying he didn't know why the stock was down.

Before it was suggested that the qdrx material would have some sinergys with the victor plugs and wires because of wear and tear. Nowdays I don't see much wire that is over a year or old because of technogly changing.
Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News