SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bearcatbob who wrote (269951)9/24/2008 9:19:58 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) of 793917
 
Obama was all for coal - with CO2 capture and sequestration. That means he is for it - but effectively against it. He is for nuclear power - when the disposal issue is resolved - for it - but effectively against it. The dems are for off shore drilling - where there is no oil - for it - but effectively against it.


Thats it - deception. Hide your real policy with weasel words.

For clean coal, but really against coal cause its never gonna be 100% clean.

For nuclear IF safely disposed of .... which means against nuclear cause nothing is gonna be safe enough.

-------------
It gets down to voting for character and good judgment and common sense over "issues". A deceptive politician like Obama will always say his position on the "issues" is whatever he thinks it takes to convince people to vote for him. But the oficial formal position on issues is meaningless cause he doesn't mean what people think he's saying.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext