Christopher, please compare and contrast both devices, and tell us why, in your opinion, they did not win the GM, Ford, or NASCAR bid.
PRICE?
PERFORMANCE?
TRAINING TIME?
FLEXIBILITY OF TUNING IN SELECTIVE FREQUENCIES?
And the biggest question of all............
**** ARE THERE ANY, I repeat ANY, competitor products that FILTER OUT BACKGROUND NOISE to assure accurate readings?
Supposedly that is why NASCAR chose MRPS and GM and FORD as well. The other ultrasound devices weren't doing the job nearly as well. In a quiet one car garage, a lot of devices would work, but in a noisy factory or outside environment, none work well but MRPS's.
The ability to ignore virtually ALL ambient noise, and tune into the SPECIFIC frequency range or a wheel bearing problem, or a valve problem or a compression leak problem, is the biggest reason why MRPS, I'm told, is winning all these bids. |
