>>>>>>>>>All one has to do is to look at your posts.
You are a bum kisser. Most of your posts deal with
kissing the gurus.<<<<<<<
Wrong rrufff- why don't you dig a bit deeper then
my last few posts. I go back with A@P since he first
posted on S.I., he is a friend and a person of integrity.
As for Auric, I don't recall ever posting on his thread.
As I have about twice the number of posts that you do,
and before you dismiss my credibility,
go back a bit, lets say my posts on the "BUSH" and
"TATRADER's Gizzard Thread".
When presented with the facts i posted, your knee-jerk
reaction was to allign me with Auric, perhaps as one
of his minions posting for him. Are you stating the
projected fundamental and technical analysis i presented
is bogus? If so, come up with facts, instead of
resorting to the actions of a desperate man who knows
he's wrong and simply attacks the verasity of the
other side.............Hmm, considering the fact that
you're an attorney, your response is totally in line
with your profession. If you can't kill the facts,
go after the messenger.
So Sherlock, i challange you to refute any of the details
i clearly posted. If you state i have no "credibility",
i'll be glad to link posts that offer conclusive evidance
that you're wrong on the facts, and the merits of
your case for MCOM are insipid and will not be admitted
since you have provided no facts, just a fictional
scenario about how great MCOM is, and how well it will
perform in the future. C'mon, counseler, we need more
facts than that. |
