Paracelsian Inc (PRLN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Paracelsian Inc (PRLN)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Regis McConnell who wrote (2814)	5/20/1997 2:52:00 AM
From: Robert Perissi	of 4342

Let's not forget what Robin suggested, however: because of this "gag" rule, even if set by the 'judge', we only get to hear one side of this accusative story. After all, Robin makes an EXTREMELY valid point: Babish WANTS to hold a shareholders meeting. How much wrong doing could he have done? Why would he want to put himself through something like that if he is "Mr. Bad Guy"? as to the back up for fda intervention..well, that was under the control of babish and koch..they were in charge at the time of the product scheduled launch.they were the ones in place. Paul, I thought most of us assumed sometime back that Mr. Rhodes was the main contributor of PRLN's past blunders? Now you imply that it was all Mr. Koch and Mr. Babish behind the problems of the past? Although I am not certain for sure, I don't agree. When was it that Rhodes actually lost control, and all power was passed over to the two men that are no longer with the Company? I don't think he ever 'left.' He was going to step down at the shareholders meeting wasn't he? As usual, only time will tell 99% of the truth. :) Happy trading everyone. -Rob

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next