Douglas,
Thanks for taking the time to open conduit to Jim. I trust he'll be a busy man...
>To all you who think in the negative, please don't waste his time and most of all our thread space.
I strongly agree that those who call should confine their inquiry constructively to hopefully yield something tangible and to prevent unnecessarily distracting our vaulted leader. God knows we can't risk that.
However, this smiling blindly on the thread proclaimation while the skies get uglier and uglier is a most unreasonable request don't you think? The thought you're provoking is from that movie where the battered soldier keeps yelling, 'Thank you Sir! May I have more', while he continually gets clobbered.
Either someone spiked your punch or you're holding back something. Mind devulging where you you got your rosy glasses? And, I'd sure like to call you on your 9/19 post #2761, to wit:
>In a week or so I will have some very good news for you loyal and frustrated shareholders...
I'd like to remind you that positive BS is every bit as disruptive wherein as that you're complaining about. I guess my point is, being so radically to the right is just as bad as being the same to the left. In fact seeing the track record here, your position seems even more unbalanced. If you indeed have inside info as you have posted, spill it or understand how us uninformed blindly feel. BTW--isn't trading or hyping based on insider info illegal in your state? Sorry, but your recent comments really amaze me!
-Scott |
