DON'T START THE WAR Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PartyTime who started this subject	1/21/2003 4:13:39 PM
From: Fangorn	of 25898

A Liberal's Case for Bush's War By Michael J. Totten FrontPageMagazine.com \| January 8, 2003 The war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan was anything but an intellectual’s war. If ever in American history a military response was a no-brainer, this was it. Three words explained why we fought: they attacked us. Iraq is dicier. On the one hand, Saddam Hussein’s reign of terror is self-evidently evil and a menace. Less obvious are the reasons we should go to war with him now as opposed to, say, North Korea, Iran, or Saudi Arabia. Or, as some would have it, with nobody. The rationale behind it is complex and controversial, and it took Clinton Administration official Kenneth Pollack more than 500 pages to explain it all in The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq. This is an intellectual’s war. the rest of this article is at frontpagemag.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next