Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (28677)	2/10/2004 3:50:31 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) of 793927

We already have a cultural system that works. You like the way it works. Others don't. If they feel that the existing system of law places undue restraints on their freedom, they have the right to petition the courts for redress. The courts have to consider the petition, and popularity isn't the issue. Things change. They've been changing for a long time, and as far as I can see they've gotten better for it. This is one very small drop in a very large bucket, and if it wasn't for all the superstitious crap surrounding homosexuality, it would be a very small matter. I still have not seen anyone present a credible argument to suggest that their specific interests or rights would be in any way infringed upon if gay people were to marry. If it's not going to hurt anyone, where's the issue?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next