SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (289677)6/25/2004 11:05:29 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Terrorism? Is a good enough answer for me!
Saddam should have pulled a Gaddafi,
but sometimes these tyrants are not quick enough,off the ball in this case.
that is a shame..for all


How about sending large sums of money to supporting terrorist organizations?
Saddam supported numerous terrorist
organizations,Hamas,Hezbollah,PLO,etc..
Did you have to be in the world trade center to get the point?

How about sending large sums of money to sucide bombers?

If you do not beleive this is supporting terrorist,what constitute supporting terrorism?


<<Saddam needed to be removed and so we did.

Given that we now know there is no WMD nor collaborations with Al-Qaeda for Iraq to threaten US with, what pressing "need" was there exactly that can possibly justify killing 10,000 innocent people, not to mention the maimed and tortured others? >>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext