<<Suggestion.... if you don't like what they did, discuss what they did... >>
See my previous posts.
<<See, in my opinion, any guy who hangs around when he doesn't own any stock and his sole purpose is to warn people away from this company, is looney tunes.>>
looney tunes?.?.? uh...yeah....if you say so.
<<BTW, do you really think that any company is going to provide you with all that information, particularly in that you aren't even a stockholder?>>
I asked for lots of information while I was a shareholder. Owning shares didn't help my cause.....
I still don't think you really understand the jist of what I'm saying. Why release positive tidbits (verncombes, Tom Dodge working on BRN, Auric, Friendship Metals) and never follow up with them. Before, I took the "I believe" approach and assumed it was just taking time. That has been, and still seems to be the approach for the remaining IPM longs. Rightfully so - why else would you own the stock. Now I take the "I don't believe" approach and assume the company is intentionally not releasing information that could materially affect the market capitalization and/or ability to continue as an ongoing concern. [The 11/14/97 PR is an obvious exception].
Finally, you win. You have successfully exorcised yet another informed, even-tempered investor who brings up specific, fact-based concerns about IPM. The thread is yours. The company is yours. Have fun with both.
bobs. |
