Steve Lee: Then why waste your time quarreling with and trying to demean people here? Neither long nor short but camping out, going out of your way to attack aspects of peoples' postings?
>I haven't shorted SUNW because there are better investments out there.
What has gone so wrong for you in the real world that you require total strangers in cyberspace to form an opinion that will make you feel good about yourself?
>I see my posts here as a public service and as a way to build credibility as and when the majority of my assessments
are proven correct (I've been pretty accurate with SUNW so far).
How can you build credibility when your mode of posting has been to belittle the poster him or herself rather than a detached reply that presents a quantifiable and/or qualifiable counterview? You even reject actually put-down twister, also down on SUNW, when he makes overtures of collegiality.
Thus far, all I see in your postings are attacks the basis of which reduces to what one of my professors in grad school called, "me, tooism." By this he meant: If this is my experience, the way I see things within the environment in which I live, it _has_ to be right, it _must_ be the norm with any differences experienced [or perceived] by others being variations to be discounted--because they are deviations. Your attacks are based on your perceptions, not on facts. There is no research to support your contentions.
If you really want people to respect, if not like, you in cyberspace, why not hang-out on the thread for a stock you do like? With a similar-minded group of people, sharing what you believe are your insights just might help you attain what you want. This is not the right thread. Rather than heed--or later recall--your words, people will get tired of your abuse and hit the 'ignore' button.
As the old saying goes: "One catches more bees with honey than with vinegar."
Lynn |
