SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis
SOXX 318.06+1.4%Jan 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: auriculatus who wrote (29432)3/17/2006 2:28:30 AM
From: etchmeister  Read Replies (1) of 95676
 
There is huge difference with regards to topline growth though these are only projections.
LRCX top line projection is close to 19% compared to AMAT's topline projection for next year - that's huge (just based on etch)which means they are really kicking ass.
AMAT and NVLS continue to be in dogfight mode and I do not see how this can get resolved.
If I recall correctly NVLS:LRCX price ratio changed from 2:1 to 0.5:1 - and it did not happen over night.
One would stick with it assuming you see a clear path out of this dogfight scenario but I don't.
I'm concerned even NVLS coming up with better CMP mousetrap AMAT will do exactly the same what they are doing in PVD (didn't Hill mention resolving it (AMAT's predatory pricing) in court - but that makes only the lawyers fat)

finance.yahoo.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext