SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (294514)7/13/2006 2:35:53 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) of 1577224
 
If it can be shown that they where not, or even if the evidence leads to the conclusion that they where not.

Hey! Speak English!

One of the people here who says we should close Gitmo points to data that say 18% of the people at Gitmo have no history of violence against the US or our allies, and no evidence of solid ties to Al Qaida or the Taliban. I have no idea how they determined that but if its true, fine let the 18% go. But closing Gitmo implies something like letting 100% go.

Well so far zero percent of the Gitmo detainees have even been accused of promoting violence against the US (they haven't been charged with anything), and zero percent of them have been proven to have committed acts of violence against the US. Zero.

Go ahead and keep Gitmo open, but justify the detention of the people that are detained there. Imprisonment without charge and conviction is unAmerican.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News