| ‘Eat Right’ Meltdown for Kraft Singles Company, Public Health Group Hold Talks on ‘Kids Eat Right’ Logo
 
 Tennille Tracy
 
 March 23, 2015 7:20 p.m. ET
 5 COMMENTS
 
 The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, one of the world’s largest groups of health professionals, is locked in talks with  Kraft Foods Group  Inc. to determine how to proceed with a controversial campaign to put  the academy’s “Kids Eat Right” logo on packages of Kraft Singles.
 
 “The  academy is working toward changing any perceptions of endorsement,”  academy spokesman Ryan O’Malley said. Talks between the parties have  been going on for several days.
 
 A partnership between the academy  and Kraft, made public earlier this month, opened a rift within the  academy, and some members have called on its leaders to disclose  financial ties with Kraft. More broadly, it has prompted questions about  the group’s credibility as a go-to source for nutritional guidance.
 
 The  controversy stepped into the limelight last week, when comedian Jon  Stewart joked on the Daily Show that “the Academy of Nutrition and  Dietetics is an academy in the same way this is cheese,” pointing to a  package of Kraft Singles.
 
 Described as a “pasteurized prepared  cheese product,” Kraft Singles are made mostly with milk, cheddar  cheese, whey, milk protein concentrate, milk fat and sodium citrate, an  emulsifier, according to the ingredients.
 
 The incident highlights  the risk public health and nutrition groups take when they partner with  food companies, often in relationships that involve donations and  sponsorships, said Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition and food  studies at New York University and an author of several books on the  food industry.
 
 The academy “has become a laughingstock,” Ms.  Nestle said. “Its viewpoints are so tainted, they’re so deeply influenced by their sponsors that it’s hard to take them seriously.”
 
 With  more than 75,000 members, mostly registered dietitians and other  nutrition professionals, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics often  plays a role in shaping national food policy. It lobbies Congress and  weighs in on the development of regulations.
 
 The partnership  between the academy and Kraft put the food giant on track to become the  first company to carry the academy’s “Kids Eat Right” logo on one of its  products. Packages of Kraft Singles were also going to include a Web  address for the campaign.
 
 The goal, according to the academy, was  to spread the word that children need more calcium and vitamin D in  their diets. “We saw this opportunity to help parents bridge that dairy  gap,” said Katie Brown, national education director for the Academy of  Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation, the academy’s philanthropic arm.
 
 As  part of the arrangement, Kraft agreed to provide money for a grant to  be used at the academy’s discretion for scholarships, research or public  education initiatives. Ms. Brown declined to disclose the sum provided  by Kraft.
 
 While the academy said it never intended for the  partnership to serve as an endorsement of Kraft Singles, critics said  consumers would assume the academy had given the product its seal of  approval.
 
 “The ‘Kids Eat Right’ logo appearing on any food  product is an implied endorsement, despite the academy’s insistence that  it is not an endorsement,” said Rachel Begun, a registered dietitian  from Boulder, Colo., and member of the academy. “This announcement  struck a nerve with members.”
 
 Ms. Begun and other academy members  have asked the academy to cut campaign ties with Kraft and to disclose  the terms of the agreement. The New York state affiliate of the academy,  with more than 5,000 members, sent a letter to the group’s leaders,  saying it, too, was concerned about the partnership with Kraft.
 
 Kraft  spokeswoman Jody Moore said the company “has never used the word  ‘endorsement’ to describe this collaboration. We have been clear Kraft  Singles is a proud supporter of Kids Eat Right and this collaboration  with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is to raise awareness of the  importance of dairy, vitamin D and calcium in kids’ diets.”
 
 According  to its 2014 annual report, the academy counts several food and beverage  companies among its corporate sponsors, including  PepsiCo Inc., General Mills Inc., Kellogg Co. and  Unilever PLC. Several additional companies served as sponsors of its conference in 2013, including  Campbell Soup Co.,  ConAgra Foods Inc. and Del Monte Corp.
 
 Each  of the companies, excluding Campbell Soup and Del Monte, contributed  $10,000 or more during the group’s 2014 fiscal year, which ended May 31,  according to the annual report. Kraft wasn’t among the companies that  donated that sum of money.
 
 The academy’s website said corporate  relationships allow it to develop and distribute messages to a broader  audience. Acknowledging that it needs to avoid the perception of a  conflict of interest, the academy states on the website that it “will  authorize no commercial use of the name and logo that would diminish  that value or damage that reputation.”
 
 The academy isn’t the only  public health group to come under fire for its relationship with food  companies. The American Diabetes Association, which has also been  criticized for accepting money from food companies, said it developed a  set of guidelines that said food and beverage products that are  identified as a “proud sponsor” of the ADA should be healthy and  nutrient-dense.
 
 Write to Tennille Tracy at  tennille.tracy@wsj.com
 
 
 |