You and Poet chimed in on Kissy to the effect that I was quite horrible. I then sent a PM to you and one to Poet suggesting, perhaps too subtly for you, that you ask Rambi to see the full text of my messages.
You are intentionally mischaracterizing my first response to you, Michael. After a thoroughly despicable series of posts you made on X's thread with the sole intention of disruption, I wrote this:
To:Michael M This is a response to a deleted message
From: Poet
Wednesday, Sep 12, 2001 3:36 AM
Respond to of 2859
Michael M,
I had signed off for the night before you wrote your deliberately provocative posts here. I've read all the posts about this on the RWET, where you
went to discuss this publicly. I am banned from the RWET as you are from here, so I'm responding from this thread.
I understand that your daughter was at the scene of horror in NYC today. I am terribly sorry this tragedy has effected your family so personally. There
were very likely tens of thousands of people killed and wounded yesterday. By the end of the week we will all have know, or known of, people who
were killed. We are all grieving.
I don't think it's right to judge the way people grieve. And beyond that, you are falling into the hands of the terrorists if this causes you (and I mean the
collective 'you' on the RWET) to point fingers and direct your grief and anger at your fellow citizens. This is just what the terrorists want. Don't
succumb to it.
My thoughts and prayers to your daughter.
I then received a PM from you, asking me to talk to my friend Rambi about your "message". Your propensity to lob bombs and engage in high-fiving (on the RWET) and PM campaigns showed me pretty quickly that you have no intention of engaging in honest debate.
The post to which I am responding further reveals your dishonesty.
Your posts here are nothing more than a series of insults, and frankly, I don't think you can do any better. |
