SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (2938)1/29/2003 4:16:36 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 15987
 
Nuclear report on Iraq challenges U.S. rationale

I prefer this more factual headline:

"US report challenges IAEA's competence on Iraq compliance rationale"

Zonder, it's been all outlined in previous inspections.. We KNOW that Saddam LIED about possessing Chemical and Biological weapons when he was forced to admit to possessing them in 1995, At least 2 years after his government certified that they had destroyed them all..

HE JUST BALD-FACED LIED ABOUT THOUSANDS OF TONNES OF WMD MATERIAL!!!!!

But we found most... however, we discovered that they had lied about how many chemical rounds they had used against Iran. One of the inspectors found a document describing a 6,500 round DISCREPANCY between what Saddam had reported were used, and the number of rounds actually used.

That's 6,500 rounds of chemical warheads, each probably packing at least 10-20 pounds of chemical, some probably far more. That is A HELL OF A LOT OF MISSING MATERIAL ZONDER!!!


And we KNOW that is what HAS NOT BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR... NEVER.. NUNCA.. JAMAIS!!!

And that's what is going to justify engaging in the overthrow of Saddam's regime and the "strip-searching" of Iraq for these weapons.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext