RADAR ACQUISITIONS CORP. RAC ON THE A.S.E. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : RADAR ACQUISITIONS CORP. RAC ON THE A.S.E.

RAC 10.30

-0.9%

3:57 PM EDT

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: beach$ who wrote (28)	10/26/1999 4:18:00 PM
From: rdww	Read Replies (2) of 56

huhh? I looked at the NR and was still confused about what you may or maynot have. I see a lot of overburden that has to be removed. There was one of the minerals with an unacceptable attachment of another mineral. It got reduced to acceptable levels - but that all costs money to do. The other thing I thought was a problem was the amount of work that it sounded like had to be done to get these samples to work out. So it looks like you have heavies - but the real breakdowns and whether it's economic to extract is still the question. I'll have another look tomorrow. Could you post the NR for everyone?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next