Last try. If you want to have an honest discussion... and learn something... which clearly seems unlikely ?
You should know that if you leave your liberal group-think bubble to try to joust with people who think instead... you are going to have to up your game considerably... because politicians talking points don't work with people who think.
People who actually do know what they are talking about... can prove it.
Do you know what the law says... or how to find out what it says ? Answer honestly if you haven't read the law... and don't know how to find it... and then we have a place to start an honest discussion.
Otherwise, go find the ACTUAL LAW that applies... and then post a link here to the exact statute that defines the whistleblower protections... but which also defines the performance requirements for coverage by the law as a whistleblower. Then we can have an honest conversation... in which you aren't pretending to know what you are talking about.
You keep saying that I don't know the law... that I need to know the law...that I have no understanding ?
First, clearly you have no way of knowing what I know... and, whatever the subject, only an idiot would open a conversation with another person that way... Second, you don't even listen or respond appropriately when I tell something you... it appears all you can do is speak by citing political commercials. Third, you are proving yourself unable to discuss the subject knowledgeably... and Fourth, are apparently unable or unwilling to actually go FIND THE ACTUAL LAW, much less find out what it really says before you proceed in speaking about it. I accept you do that... because you've been lied to first... and wrongly trust people who are lying to you... but if you aren't willing to exert the basic tiny bit of effort required to FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF... as required to have an honest conversation ?
Then... like those who are lying to you... you are not dealing with me in good faith... and you are not worth the time to teach you anything... if you can't and won't listen and learn...
If you won't do that... you are proving yourself ignorant (literally) and are being dishonest... and wasting my time... trolling.
So, go find the "whistleblower statutes" you want to quote... post a link here... and make an intelligent input about them... or I will ban you for violating the requirements to participate here.
The requirement here, on my list is: "Respectful discussion and debate welcome from all quarters. Obvious assholes and trolls will be immediately banned. If you don't belong here, and are not civil, then don't be here, or expect you will be very long."
Civility requires... good faith. Thus far, you are not demonstrating the basic good faith required to have an honest conversation.
Now you have attached labels to certain characters (comey is a communist) This is another republican who is considered to have high standards but he is now a communist. WOW! Keep allowing yourself to be manipulated by POTUS and FOX.
That reply... proves you are clueless. If Republicans declare Steve Bannon and the Koch Brothers to be Democrats with high standards... does that make it true ?
I'm not manipulated by anyone... least of all you. You should learn from this... to not speak about things you know nothing about... or all you accomplish is to PROVE yourself ignorant. Before replying to others while pretending you know what you are talking about... research what you are being told... so you can prove it or disprove it... before opening your pie hole.
Here's Comey in his own words... in a context making it clear that the only legitimate use of Comey and Republican in the same sentence is in the way the article uses it... as "Republican appointed". That Republicans were idiots for ever appointing him ? Yeah. I said that BEFORE they did. But, it should go without saying at this point ?
Here's the relevant text from the link:
"Comey has been savaged by William Safire and lauded by Chuck Schumer; just what kind of Republican is he, anyway? This sets Comey howling again. “I must be doing something right!” he says. “In college, I was left of center, and through a gradual process I found myself more comfortable with a lot of the ideas and approaches the Republicans were using.” He voted for Carter in 1980, but in ’84, “I voted for Reagan—I’d moved from Communist to whatever I am now. I’m not even sure how to characterize myself politically. Maybe at some point, I’ll have to figure it out.”
So, do you agree with Comey that he "was" a communist ? Or not.
Can you find out for yourself whether that's true of Brennan without my having to DO THE WORK FOR YOU? |
