International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Joe Hartenbower who wrote (30010)	1/20/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: go4it	of 35569

Joe, <<Awaaaaaaaa CB, come on and share with us. Your style is great.>> A man has got to have style <g>. We have been severly spoiled last year by the amount of information that we were able to receive from IPM. Some of the information was inappropriate knowledge IMO and I think that others feel the same way. With the shorts having trouble getting control of the stock and their normal bad media blitz not working. The fund ownership growing and the float shrinking. I think the shorts started trying to play legal manipulative games and called on the exchanges and their regulatory bodies to step in. It is no secret that the SEC monitors these threads, I think the company has come under tough scrutiny lately. This will cause very little if any substantial news from leaking out. Nobody knows anything right now so it seems and it isn't because of stock manipulation or a crooked operation, it is because the channels have been shut off. Hell even thall has a better source of information then some right now, scary. IPM continues to do their job but no one is going to be able to say they heard it first on SI. We will learn when everyone else in the world does. So goes the theory. Chuck

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next