SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3003)5/7/2004 7:12:25 AM
From: Glenn Petersen   of 3602
 
Firm Told It May Not Audit Public Companies

Denial Is Oversight Board's First


washingtonpost.com

By Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 7, 2004; Page E02

The accounting industry's oversight panel has for the first time rejected an audit firm's application to review the books of publicly traded companies.

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, created under the landmark 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act to monitor the troubled accounting profession, yesterday said it had "disapproved" the application of James C. Marshall PC, a Scottsdale, Ariz., firm that audited several public clients.

As part of its mandate, the oversight board is reviewing and registering all accounting firms with clients who sell stock to the public. Since those reviews began last September, the board has approved 840 audit firms as of this week, while the applications of 143 more firms are pending.

The board said Marshall "failed to disclose" in its application that the firm was the subject of a disciplinary proceeding. The panel also cited Marshall's alleged failure to enlist another accountant to provide a second opinion on the firm's work and to keep documents backing up the firm's conclusions. Marshall had promised to take those steps after peer reviewers criticized the firm's record-keeping and other practices in 2000 and 2001.

Board member Kayla J. Gillan said in an interview yesterday that the panel bases its decisions on "whether registering [accounting firms] and allowing them access to the public markets is in the best interest of investors." The board looks for negative peer reviews and firms that have been sued over their work, among other factors, Gillan said.

James C. Marshall, the president of the company, did not return calls for comment yesterday. He did not appeal the board's decision, a factor that sped up the rejection process. In a November 2001 letter to peer reviewers, Marshall said he and his staff were taking courses to beef up their skills and that a failed merger with another accounting firm had contributed to his documentation problems.

In the past three months, at least three of Marshall's former clients, Dstage.com Inc., American Soil Technologies Inc. and Silverado Financial Inc., filed papers with the SEC saying they had hired new auditors.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext