SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ajtj99 who wrote (30305)7/12/2021 4:57:01 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (2) of 97457
 
I don't think they should be FDA approved -- too many adverse reactions have happened.
the supposed protection offered cannot be justified by the harm.

Would you agree to this?

Each persopn should be free to assess their liklihood of catching covid and suffering damage against

1) The likelihood of the vaccines preventing contraction if one is exposed to covid?

2) the likelihood of an adverse reaction to the vaccine?

The reason I am asking is I feel the media were deceptive and continue to be deceptive regarding these matters.

Take the initial coverage in three regards:

First the sensationalism surrounding those rare instances in which young people caught covid and died.
Can you at least recognize that for the hype and fear-mongering that it was -- or do you think it was just legitimate reporting and balanced?? [How much reporting of adverse reactions that have killed or debilitated youngsters has been reported? You know there are cases of this, correct -- or do you deny?]

Second, the completely false accounts of effectiveness of the vaccines in preventing covid.
These are clearly being shown to be false by the actual rollout.
Have you been watching the numbers of those contracting covid and dying who have had the vaccine?

Third, the patently false identification of a case of covid with a postitive PCR test.

I know there are many here who are quite intelligent -- maybe not prone to believe everything that they see on the nightly news??

But so much on this thread that is quoted comes from the mass media and seems to be assumed to be verified as fact.

Let me ask you this:

Is there anything of significant import reported by the media over the last ten years -- that upon reflection later -- you were reasonably convinced it was true at first -- but found out later that it was 180% untrue??
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News