Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: charred who wrote (3044)	7/11/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) of 4504

<<All I am saying it's not a piece of cake to move over 10,000 people where ever you are. Besides the cost everyone has to agree. I am sure management knows this. >> No doubt Charred. But in the eventuality that they come up with a positive feasibility... it is likely that there will be some agreements with the governement, simply because of the large number of jobs created. What about the possibilities of grant or tax reliefs... We don't know. Anyway, I feel this problem is one that must be dealt with in due time. For now, the game is one of defining resources. And the larger the resources are, the higher will go the stock and the smaller the "town" problem will be. From an investor point of view, I prefer to think that MAN is possibly sitting on a new mining camp that may exceed Antamina in both scope and value.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next