I know for a fact that Intel has acquired a stable of profound architectural thinkers from both academia and industry. My impression of the people they had in place (and this goes back almost 12 years) and who were then coming on board was that they had a stable of computer scientists who could hold their own with anybody in the industry.
Intel had the unique problem of creating architectures which extend capability while maintaining 100% backward compatibility. Having worked at the emulation game myself for about 10 years, I can tell you that that is a bear. It is doable but difficult. What they have accomplished in the last decade is a near miracle. Also, contrary to the WSJ article, I see an awfully solid next five years from just what they have in the pipeline today.
I have seen every new architecture, from the transputer to the 68000 to the Dec Alpha to the PowerPC touted as the Intel killer. Hasn't happened. Might in the future, but you are fighting a paranoid, well managed, feisty, smart, well funded design, manufacturing and sales organization competent to a level previously unseen on the planet. Good luck to cyrix, nexgen-amd, sunw, dec, whomever. You're getting into the ring with Mike Tyson at his prime, on steroids and angry. there must be easier fights to pick.
Burt |