One way to fix the DoD procurement problems
THE CAPTAIN'S JOURNAL
By Herschel Smith on Weapons and Tactics
In Pentagon Plans Huge New Bureaucracy we discussed the addition of 20,000 new government jobs in the Department of Defense to set up yet more bureaucracy regarding weapons and systems procurement. The Telegraph gives us a nice counterexample - a bright moment in an otherwise apoplectic organization that has too much inertia to be innovative.
>>> The devices have been embraced by the military because they are relatively easy to use, can safely carry secure software and are far cheaper than manufacturing a version specifically for the army.
Capable of holding more than 30,000 programmes, Apple's best-sellers are being used for everything from translating to working out the trajectories of snipers.
The military is also working on how they can be used as guidance systems for bomb disposal robots and to receive aerial footage from unmanned drone aircraft, according to the Independent.
The US Marine Corps is currently funding an application that would allow soldiers to upload photographs of detained suspects, along with written reports, into a biometric database. The software would match faces, in theory making it easier to track suspects after they're released.
While members of the British military who have seen the Apple instruments in action are envious, the Ministry of Defence remains wary of security implications and has "no plans" at present to go down the American path.
But Lieutenant Colonel Jim Ross, the director of the US Army's intelligence, electronic warfare and sensors operation, believes the iPod "may be all that the personnel need".
"What gives it added advantage is that a lot of them have their own personal ones so they are familiar with them," he told the paper.
Another advantage is the price. The iPod touch (which soldiers can use over a secure WiFi network) retails for around $230 (£150) and the iPhone for $600. Bulk orders placed by the Pentagon bring further savings.<<<
This kind of latitude and flexibility is usually threatening to a chain of command that wants to control every little detail and ensure uniformity. But uniformity is not the goal here, and this example ought to be emulated throughout all four branches of the service. The best way to begin to hold the Department of Defense bureaucracy accountable for timeliness and results is to bypass them. In order to play the game, they will have to adapt to the more flexible chain of command which is entrusting its officers and NCOs with more responsibility and authority. In the end, everyone will be a winner. |
