SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 174.80+0.3%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: saukriver who wrote (30706)1/4/2003 1:21:08 PM
From: John Biddle  Read Replies (1) of 196851
 
Carriers have been yakking about number portability since the mid-1990s. Then, they sack it when it comes close to being allowed by the FCC. It is a game. If they really wanted it, they would make it happen.

I think you have this backward. The FCC is mandating number portability and has extended the deadline at the carriers request.

Carriers hate the idea of number portability! Not only those who think they'll see a net loss in subscribers, but all who aren't sure they'll see significant net increases. If the six biggest carriers traded several millions of customers they all have significant extra costs, but only the net winner gets to offset that cost with future revenues. Note the focus of analysts on churn.

The increase in competition would be substantial because they would soon be fighting not only over new subscribers, and subscribers so dissatisfied they're willing to go through the hassle of changing numbers, but all subscribers. This would inevitably lead to price wars and huge increases in advertising budgets, just to break even.

Carriers will continue to fight number portability as long as they can.

wirelessnewsfactor.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext