SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Potenza who wrote (30900)3/7/1998 8:48:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson   of 35569
 
Don, The computers lack any real strategic sense. They are massively parallel engines, with some pattern smarts, able to look down causal trees to great depth if they narrow their search pattern. A human recognizes patterns and uses strategy. The best strategy is to work beyond the machines average look depth at one point. If the machine looks 7 ahead all over, and then looks 20 ahead along one string, and then puts that string into action, the master finds a trap that is more than 7 moves out and is irrevocable by the time the machine sees it at 7. As the machines get better their overall view extends furher that the 7 (i just picked that value arbitrarily) then the human needs to work further out. The problem is once you work further out and the machine can solve for all moves there are fewer and fewer irrevocable traps, and we are reduced to systematic machine play and a draw, or error.
Ultimately the machines will grind men down and in a few years will win all matches. Go is different, it is an oriental game with incalculable variety, and yet simple moves. The best Go computers can be beaten by any good child. The tree grows even faster than with chess. D a search on Go, it is fascinating.

Bill

Bill
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext