SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bruce Robbins who wrote (3019)7/14/1999 6:37:00 AM
From: Jeff Dickson  Read Replies (1) of 4504
 
Bruce,

Since the sulphides typically have a density 5 or so times greater than the surrounding material, why would a connection say between TG1 and TG3 not show up in a gravity survey? Would this suggest that the connection is down fairly deep? I presume there is some sort of 1/d or 1/d^2 relation at work (d=depth) with the gravity survey.

If Teck had two or three 100 million ton deposits separated by a kilometer or so, would they drop some deep drills from the surface to explore a trend, or is that something that typically waits until reserve expansion of an existing mine? Especially if Teck (for sake of example) had many other interesting targets to explore. I guess the accessability of the drill sites might have some impact, but let's assume it is just flat farmland type area.

Thanks and regards,

-jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News