GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mike M who wrote (3146)	11/8/2000 12:08:44 PM
From: Hank	of 5582

"It is quite apparent that the individual conducting peer review considered your points to be irrelevant." No, it's not apparent. Every journal has different criteria for publication. ENT's was obviously met by this article but that doesn't mean my points are irrelevant. A more highly regarded journal with more stringent requirements for publication, such as NEJM, would have also asked these questions and that is probably why your bogus predictions of a NEJM over a year ago never materialized. The fact is, my points are valid enough for even a non-scientist to understand, assuming they have half a brain (which leaves you out). If they are irrelevant, then I challenge you to find somebody that can tell me why. But you won't do that because the job of a good shill is to avoid the truth at all costs while trying to make your adversaries appear as though they don't know what they are talking about. In any case, whether you believe me or not, the stock WILL continue to go down. It WILL eventually trade below $5. And I WILL be the last one to leave this board.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next