SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Harken Energy Corporation (HEC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ditchdigger who wrote (3189)7/10/1998 8:49:00 AM
From: drjoedoom   of 5504
 
Ditchdigger -- OK, I misunderstood.

You wrote:

<< Actually, IMO it is the description of shorting against the block that was the relevant point. The SEC article describe this quite clearly. Instead of covering with Reg S converted shares,one could subsitute shares from the convertible debentures quite easily. >>

Thanks. You're absolutely right. The description of how a short would profit from shorting against the block to lock in gains from Reg S shares bought at a discount was very clear and helpful.

In theory, the same technique could be used with the floorless preferreds, particularly if the conversion occurred at a discount and there were no other safeguards.

So I thought you were making a further point -- that holders of HEC's convertibles COULD & WOULD use this technique to profit from short sales. I guess I jumped to this conclusion. Sorry.

Anyway, my response -- to the point you never made -- was that in practice, with HEC's convertibles, this wouldn't happen, at least not in a way we should be afraid of:

1. For HEC's $35 MM development financings, there is no discount and HEC can convert for cash rather than shares. So the would-be short has no motivation to sell (no discount) and no assurance that the conversion will supply shares that can be used to cover a short.

2. For HEC's $15 MM of Series F Preferred, there is a 10% discount after Jan 1999, but conversion can occur only after a 15% increase in the stock price. And again, if the price is below $4.80, HEC can pay cash. So holders of the convertible can't sell indiscriminately; if they do and the stock depreciates, they can't convert. If they do sell and drive the price below $4.80, they may find themselves with cash but no shares, needing to cover. Not the risk-free Reg-S arbitrage you describe.

Side note: I wasn't kidding in my earliest post on this that I'm a complete layman, so don't anybody think this is an expert's analysis. I'm just reading the financing agreement and applying common sense. But the more I read the more I am convinced that there is no risk of Zeev's dreaded "death spiral." The more I think about the way these deals have been structured, the more impressed I am with HEC's financial management.

Joe

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext